The Reality Behind Bryan Johnson’s “Rejuvenation Olympics” — And Why NOVOS Is Sharing Its Own Biological Aging Results

In recent years, many people interested in longevity have come across the website known as the Rejuvenation Olympics, created by entrepreneur and biohacker Bryan Johnson. The site presents itself as an open global competition ranking individuals by their biological age and pace of aging, using epigenetic tests as the scoring mechanism.

While public interest in biological age is a positive trend, the Rejuvenation Olympics has introduced evolving rules, submission requirements, and backend changes that have made it difficult for many participants—including members of the NOVOS community—to receive accurate recognition for their verified results. Because biological age testing is a scientific field, not a sport, we believe transparency, stable criteria, and methodological consistency are essential.

To ensure that our customers and non-customers alike have a clear place to compare their DunedinPACE pace-of-aging results, we are publishing independently verified data of the Top 100 NOVOS customer participants here. Note that these results are arrived at by the same third-party lab that is used by the Rejuvenation Olympics, and are not generated by NOVOS.

We have also restored inclusion of chronological age, because it is well known by the scientific community that higher chronological ages make it more difficult to achieve a lower biological pace of aging. For example, a 75 year old with a pace of 0.6 is more impressive than a 45 year old with a pace of 0.55.

Key Takeaways

• NOVOS customers achieve exceptional biological aging results, especially on the DunedinPACE epigenetic blood test, created by researchers at Duke and Columbia Universities and considered one of the most scientifically validated measures of pace of aging.
• The Rejuvenation Olympics leaderboard has undergone multiple rule and eligibility changes without prior public explanation, resulting in previously listed participants being removed or reclassified. Customers requesting their clinic be updated to accurately reflect NOVOS have been told that it is not possible without a notarized contract.
• Because these shifting policies have made it difficult for NOVOS community members to receive acknowledgement for their scientifically valid scores, we are publishing their DunedinPACE results directly and transparently.

Why Publish a NOVOS List of Biological Aging Results?

The Rejuvenation Olympics has popularized the idea of a global leaderboard ranking biological age. However, several structural and administrative choices create challenges for participants:

1. Changing Rules Without Notice

Criteria for inclusion have been updated multiple times, sometimes resulting in participants being removed from the leaderboard despite having verified lab tests, and in one case, an entire leaderboard completely removed without prior notice. These rule changes were not publicly announced or explained, leaving many confused about the basis for inclusion.

2. Barriers to Updating Clinic or Test Provider Information

Some NOVOS customers have reported difficulty updating the “clinic” associated with their test results, with requests requiring steps such as obtaining a notarized contract—a process practically unheard of in scientific data submission and an unecessary barrier for individuals who simply want their provider listed accurately.

3. Ensuring Our Community Gets the Recognition It Deserves

NOVOS customers frequently outperform population averages on DunedinPACE, often showing a biological rate of aging far lower than even health-centric populations. To give these results the visibility they deserve, we are publishing the Top 100 results independently, while encouraging any public leaderboard to adopt clear and consistent rules.

Our Goal: Transparency, Scientific Clarity, and Empowerment

We respect the enthusiasm that the Rejuvenation Olympics has brought to the longevity space. At the same time, biological age is a scientific measurement, not a competition dependent on changeable administrative decisions.

By publishing NOVOS customers’ DunedinPACE results on our own platform, we aim to:

• Provide transparent data without arbitrary or changing rules
• Offer a stable reference point for individuals tracking their biological aging
• Empower people with accurate scientific interpretation, rather than leaderboard dynamics
• Celebrate real improvements in healthspan that NOVOS is empowering people with, supported by peer-reviewed science

We welcome any future improvements to public biological aging leaderboards and look forward to greater standardization across the field.

Until then, this page will serve as a reliable, simple, unfiltered resource for those seeking clarity on biological age, pace of aging, and the measurable impact of that NOVOS’ lifestyle and supplementation strategies can have on longevity.

NOVOS Community Results for Biological Pace of Aging

Ranking	Date Collected	Customer Initials	Chronological Age	Pace Output
1	8/6/2024	AN	55.36	0.46
2	10/17/2024	AP	64.97	0.49
3	1/1/2025	BS	41.85	0.52
4	9/25/2023	MH	40.19	0.52
5	3/26/2025	ZB	35.76	0.53
6	8/5/2025	DL	42.63	0.54
7	3/3/2025	AT	59.68	0.55
8	10/10/2025	FP	59.92	0.56
9	5/12/2025	DK	48.26	0.56
10	12/17/2023	HW	56.57	0.56
11	5/30/2023	DO	33.93	0.56
12	5/22/2025	D	54.05	0.57
13	5/17/2025	GG	52.59	0.58
14	5/4/2025	RE	42.67	0.58
15	8/7/2023	MS	45.18	0.58
16	6/12/2025	SP	59.29	0.59
17	6/10/2025	L	71.24	0.59
18	10/15/2024	OH	39.05	0.59
19	7/18/2023	JC	40.51	0.59
20	7/27/2025	SK	46.84	0.6
21	4/10/2025	CG	62.44	0.6
22	2/26/2025	TE	36.46	0.6
23	6/5/2023	AR	43.17	0.6
24	5/3/2023	TP	47.69	0.6
25	10/6/2025	TB	59.81	0.61
26	8/26/2025	JF	68.68	0.61
27	6/1/2025	LB	38.4	0.61
28	3/5/2025	Ab	34.1	0.61
29	9/18/2025	JS	47.51	0.62
30	7/15/2025	JB	49.11	0.63
31	5/13/2025	AO	54.21	0.63
32	7/2/2025	GS	37.45	0.63
33	5/25/2023	KG	66.3	0.63
34	5/15/2023	BM	48.9	0.63
35	5/3/2023	DS	35.93	0.63
36	10/16/2025	MD	37.23	0.64
37	7/2/2025	JS	43.98	0.64
38	4/17/2025	FM	67.59	0.64
39	4/15/2025	EC	53.51	0.64
40	9/23/2024	AL	35.55	0.64
41	9/20/2024	DL	41.76	0.64
42	7/10/2024	AC	59.11	0.64
43	7/13/2024	ZT	31.66	0.64
44	9/10/2023	oR	55.65	0.64
45	6/23/2023	SK	44.75	0.64
46	6/9/2023	DR	40.78	0.64
47	5/24/2023	BC	26.07	0.64
48	5/1/2023	KR	39.59	0.64
49	12/18/2022	NS	27.93	0.64
50	8/18/2025	PH	56	0.65
51	8/3/2025	AA	44.01	0.65
52	6/4/2025	PA	56.39	0.65
53	5/23/2025	PN	32.17	0.65
54	5/12/2025	JF	46.96	0.65
55	4/25/2025	CK	42.56	0.65
56	3/13/2025	AF	43.83	0.65
57	1/26/2024	MS	40.1	0.65
58	10/12/2023	DF	46.32	0.65
59	7/9/2023	TG	33.71	0.65
60	6/30/2023	JC	54.71	0.65
61	6/15/2023	SS	47.51	0.65
62	6/7/2023	MD	45.73	0.65
63	3/1/2023	TK	69.72	0.65
64	2/8/2023	KJ	38.81	0.65
65	9/14/2025	AA	20.53	0.66
66	9/18/2025	BS	29.16	0.66
67	8/19/2025	D	48.38	0.66
68	4/28/2025	K	29.08	0.66
69	4/22/2025	PP	38.54	0.66
70	10/18/2024	MH	35.5	0.66
71	9/3/2024	FC	32.97	0.66
72	1/17/2025	rs	49.8	0.66
73	6/3/2025	DC	40.22	0.66
74	10/20/2023	IB	31.44	0.66
75	10/14/2023	sr	34.1	0.66
76	8/26/2023	LD	28.23	0.66
77	7/18/2023	EF	53.01	0.66
78	6/14/2023	MH	32.44	0.66
79	5/20/2023	SK	30.02	0.66
80	3/20/2023	HJ	56.19	0.66
81	7/11/2025	CB	40.86	0.67
82	7/2/2025	ST	61.48	0.67
83	7/1/2025	BC	36.52	0.67
84	3/26/2025	DC	48.77	0.67
85	9/25/2024	CN	25.29	0.67
86	8/15/2025	TG	45.29	0.67
87	10/29/2023	JC	69.85	0.67
88	7/12/2023	dJ	48.36	0.67
89	5/27/2023	AH	25.26	0.67
90	4/13/2023	AN	32.29	0.67
91	3/24/2022	AN	42.09	0.67
92	11/4/2025	DL	42.88	0.68
93	9/20/2025	PG	35.9	0.68
94	6/26/2025	JA	54.28	0.68
95	6/22/2025	AT	54.8	0.68
96	6/16/2025	JR	47.64	0.68
97	6/15/2025	LA	68.37	0.68
98	6/6/2025	TR	61	0.68
99	3/30/2025	CS	34.97	0.68
100	4/1/2025	LS	42.58	0.68